​I have been laboring as the Evangelist and Preacher at the Church of Christ in Brookfield, Illinois, for twenty-three years.  In that time, I have experienced many changes both personally and congregationally.  The Saints at Brookfield are lovely people who, in their way, reflect what we can expect out in the world.  The Lord has used the work and the people of Brookfield to shape and mold me.  Many victories and setbacks have contributed to the current wisdom I use to write this Blog.   I'm prayerful this message is thoughtful and encouraging because I can contribute to thinking about the church's future.  

​Covid-19 needs to be considered a blessing to the Saints.  The disease and its handling exposed our readiness to deal with life's significant events.  Many were left unprepared for how to do business under the strict mandates our government required.  Some were prepared to continue and served their fellowship reasonably well.  We consider it joy when faced with the difficulty Covid-19 presents.  I have a concern that we did not consider after Covid-19, and its variants are not the disruptive occurrence they have been.  

​Change is a constant. Many proclaim not to like change.  Fortunately, change has come, and we must face it.  I hope that we face it with courage and optimism.  Planning is not a wrong endeavor for the church.  However, many a congregation and leadership do not forward plan. The reasons for this are manifold, and I will not go down that rabbit hole. If what I'm writing is helpful, let that be enough to stir us on to good works.  

Here are a few things I would like to mention that the church and leadership need to be aware of and action plan to confront:

1. Assembly will be precious because people will believe in legitimate reasons for not assembling.
2. Congregations will need to improve their digital footprint moving forward, and content must be up to date.
3. Leadership needs to create a means for members to personally evaluate their knowledge and wisdom where the faith is concerned. 

More things could go on this list. I'm going to stop with these three items to begin explaining. Two other blogs will deal with numbers two and three. ​

​Number one should be pretty self-explanatory.  Covid-19 will not be the last disease or public approach to a problem that will affect church assembling and attendance at a corporate event.  Leaders need to consider various ways to keep the continuity of their membership during the challenges of a corporate assembly.  I want to mention two ideas.  

​One idea is precisely what many did, which was to live stream their events.  Live Streaming allowed people to stay at home, not risking catching the virus.  Live Streaming is not going anywhere, so congregations need to figure out the best ways to do it.  I strongly advise that the live stream experience needs to be interactive.  If members only have to watch the event, they will lose intensity and connection with their faith and church family.  Other household needs will compete for their attention in ways that physical attendance eliminates.  We must find ways for members to participate in the live stream.

​They will need ways to say, Amen.  Methods need to be implemented with current live streams to make prayer requests.  Our streams should allow members to chat with one another.  Of course, giving is vital for members to fulfill their calling—the method of giving needs to allow anyone to contribute if they are inspired.  A simple weekly arrangement with your bank doesn't address this matter.  An ability to ask questions and answer them is a must to encourage the congregation's spiritual growth.  These are just a few things our live Streaming should provide to our members to continue to help them grow in spirit and truth.

​Join me in this discussion in "Looking to the Future."  What other ideas would you add?

Leave you comments.
​
Love, Grace, and Blessings,
Barry G. Johnson, Sr.
www.BarrysBureau.com

The year 2020 is coming to a close.  With the reality of Covid-19, it indeed was challenging on many fronts.  There was an opportunity for us to grow in our knowledge of God and His Word.  If we took advantage and redeemed the time, we would have learned that “Christianity is Reality.” The past year brought lessons demonstrating that “There is a God,” “Man has a Soul,” “Truth is Objective,” “The Gospel Lives,” “There is Good and Evil,” “All Have Sinned,” “Love Conquers Hate,” “There is a Heaven,” “The Hell of Scripture,” and “The Oneness of Scripture.” In this last month of the year, our pulpit can quickly summarize that “Man Needs Saving.”  

The Pandemic has made this an urgent reality, and hopefully, men have paid attention.  Scripture tells us in Isaiah 45:22 (ESV) 22 “Turn to me and be saved, all the ends of the earth! For I am God, and there is no other. The Bible also reveals in John 14:6 (ESV) 6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. The necessity of men need of saving is found in Romans 3:10–12 (ESV) 10 as it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one; 11 no one understands; no one seeks for God. 12 All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.” In short, “Man Needs Saving.”

In December, join us for more knowledge to make our calling and election sure.  Be there to hear the message that will have you walking in the light as He is in the light.  The blood of Jesus is available to purify humanity of sins.  You can see and interact with these lessons on our Facebook Page, website, and YouTube and Vimeo channels.  Leave comments; questions endeavor to glory in the salvation that is delivered once and for all.
I look forward to your participation in the reality of your won salvation.
​
Grace and Blessings,
Barry G. Johnson, Sr.
www.bgjsr22.com

"Christianity is Reality" the theme for 2020 here at the Church of Christ, which meets in Brookfield, IL.  Each month lessons have supported that compelling truth.  In June begins six lessons ending July 12th, looking at the Reality, 'All Have Sinned."

Everyone considers themselves good people.  We all have a standard of who we think is right and who is not.  Reality is that our goodness pales in comparison to God.  Our righteousness falls completely short of His character and being.  

Sin is like a virus affecting the whole world.  Without discrimination, "All Have Sinned," requiring a remedy.  A cure before it becomes too late, and we die in our sins.  Jesus is that remedy; He is the cure for what ails humankind.  The Bible, His revelation speaks to humankind's healing.

Following that revelation, we will learn all about the virus of sin.  Not only does God's Word teach us that truth, but it also prepares us for how to deal with it.  Even in times of distress, there is proper conduct that is pleasing to God.  It is our prayer that man will find himself operating in God's truth.
​
The Reality, "All Have Sinned," should cause preparedness in man to avoid the virus of sin best we can.  Hear the Word that straightens out our crooked path.

Make plans now to join us every opportunity you must take in this knowledge revealed to us to navigate Reality.  Check our website for scheduled lessons.

https://www.brookfieldcoc.com/

Make it your Reality to live following God's Word and revelation.  Hear and follow His ways will give us all the best possible lives.
​
Barry G. Johnson, Sr.

​At the Church of Christ, which meets in Brookfield, IL, we are enjoying inspiring lessons demonstrating, "Christianity is Reality." In January, morning lessons were about the Reality of God's existence. February dealt with, "Man is a Soul." The month of March was all about, "Reality is, Truth is Objective." April's theme was "The Gospel Lives."

​At the time of this writing, our world struggles in the Covid-19 Virus Pandemic. I cannot know the details of the future, so it will be fascinating to see how man will recover from the news that has quite literally changed the world. The truths of scripture are timeless, and they are profitable in good times and bad. I pray we trust in God and follow His revelation for our lives.

​When we follow that revelation, we will learn that there is "Good and Evil." Not only does God's Word teach us that truth, but it also prepares us for how to deal with it. Even in times of distress, there is proper conduct that is pleasing to God. It is our prayer that man will find itself operating in His truth.

​The Reality of good and evil should always cause preparedness for things we will confront. Hear the Word that straightens out our crooked path.

Make plans now to join us every opportunity you must take in this knowledge revealed to us to navigate Reality.

Check our website for scheduled lessons. https://www.brookfieldcoc.com/

​Watch lessons on our Vimeo channel. https://vimeo.com/brookfieldcoc

Make it your Reality to live following God's Word and revelation. Hear and follow His ways will give us all the best possible lives.

Barry G. Johnson, Sr.

​At the Church of Christ, which meets in Brookfield, IL, we are enjoying an inspiring series of lessons demonstrating, "Christianity is Reality." In January, morning lessons were about the Reality of God's existence. February dealt with, "Man is a Soul." The month of March was all about, "Reality is, Truth is Objective."

These lessons have inspired the faithful and enlightened the skeptic. In our world today, man has exchanged the Word of Truth for the inventions of humankind. Those things that are evil in our lives are blamed on God, while anything good, credit is given to man.

​​A living Gospel that saves the lost and strengthens the saved is completely logical. The Good News is not fairy tales nor the work of conspirators. The Gospel makes sense out of our crazy lives, and it explains the unexplainable. It gives answers to life's dilemmas and puts a light on the path less traveled by our society. An exhortation of truth speaks to our souls in a way nothing else can.

​By growing our fellowship, you'll benefit like many from knowing a truth that sets man free.

Make plans now to join us every opportunity you must take in this knowledge revealed to us to navigate Reality.

Check our website for scheduled lessons. https://www.brookfieldcoc.com/

Watch lessons on our Vimeo channel. https://vimeo.com/brookfieldcoc

​Make it your Reality to live following God's Word and revelation. Hear and follow His ways will give us all the best possible lives.

Barry G. Johnson, Sr.
​www.bgjsr22.com

​As we finish out this year of 2019, I would like to think we all experienced some personal growth.  Now is a great time to consider and plan how 2020 can be even better.  Our recently delivered sermon entitled “It Is the Fullness of Time” revealed to us a wonderful truth from God’s Word.  That truth stated that we can achieve what God has intended if we align with Him in preparation; purpose and plan.  You can view or listen to that lesson at www.barrygjohnsonsr.com/2019-sermons.html.

God is always prepared; He is never caught off guard.  God always works with a purpose; He is not aimless having no sense of direction.  God has always had a plan; He continues to work it and reveal it through His Son. 

If you desire to make 2020 an even better year than 2019 then align yourself with God’s plan; purpose and preparation.  The Lord’s plan can only be found in the Bible.  God’s purpose is revealed only in His Son.  How you prepare is your choice.  What you do to make 2020 a better year begins now.  Let me suggest you consider adding God to your plans in a significant way. 

Come and visit at your earliest opportunity considering the powerful impact of being a part of a Church community that holds the Bible in high regard.  It’s teaching when followed will transform you in a way that you’ll experience your best year yet.  Not only that but the Bible can secure your eternal destiny unlike anything else available to man.  We look forward to meeting you, helping one another to know God’s Will.  Together this next year we can grow like no other and help others to do the same.  See you soon.  

Before we can begin to discuss the whole why does God allow evil debate, we need to have an understanding of what evil is.

While evil is real, it is not a thing.  The argument goes like this:

1. God created all things
2. Evil is a thing
3. Therefore, God created evil

Then we get all upset because we want to know how to square the idea of a good God creating evil.  The error is found in the second premise, that evil is a thing.  Evil is not a thing, even though it is real.  Evil does not exist on it's own.  It only exists as a lack or deficiency in a good thing.  

Evil is like the rust in a car: If you take all of the rust out of the car, you have a better car; if you take the car out of the rust, you have nothing.  Evil is like a cut in your finger: If you take the cut out of your finger, you have a better finger; if you take the finger out of your cut, you have nothing.  In other words, evil only makes sense against the backdrop of good.  That's why we often describe evil as negotiations of good things.  We say someone is immoral; unjust; unfair; dishonest, etc.

So evil can't exist unless good exists.  But good can't exist unless God exists.  In other words, there can be no objective evil unless there is objective good, and there can be no objective good unless God exists.  If evil is real - and we all know it is - Then God exists.[1]  Therefore the question of evil is better used to prove God's existence rather than disproving His existence.

[1] - Stealing from God by Frank Turek

​By Brian Chilton
Recently, news agencies filled the airwaves and the internet with the news of Stephen Hawking’s last book to be published and released posthumously. The book released on October 16, 2018, is entitled Brief Answers to the Big Questions. Hawking argues through a series of essays why he didn’t think that God existed, did not think it was possible for God to exist, and did not believe in an afterlife. He appeals to quantum mechanics and the bizarre behavior of quantum particles which seemingly appear to pop into existence from nothing to argue his case. However, it should be noted that quantum particles do not really pop into existence from nothing as philosophically understood to be “no-thing.” Rather, quantum particles derive from a quantum vacuum—a very physical thing with very physical properties and processes. Thus, while admittedly I am not a physicist nor a physicist’s son, Hawking’s claim is not honest with the scientific data.

​This causes one to ask, do we have good reasons to believe in God’s existence? I would like to propose ten reasons why we can believe that he does. To be forthright, there are many, many more. These represent some of the more popular reasons to believe that there really is a God who transcends reality and a few that I think stand to reason by the very nature of the way the world works.

1. Necessity of a First Cause (Cosmological Argument). Physicists Borde, Guth, and Vilenkin discovered a mathematical theorem which dictates that all physical universes, including the theoretical multiverse, must have a required starting point. There was a time when physics (even quantum physics), time, and matter did not exist. How did it come to be? Atheists will argue that it just is. However, the data seems to suggest that an eternal, metaphysical (beyond the physical realm), Mind brought everything to be. That Mind would need to be omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient. That Mind is who we know to be God.
2. Designed Creation (Teleological Argument). Hugh Ross has argued that there are over 180 cosmological constants in the universe so finely tuned that if they were to be changed by the nth degree, life and the universe itself would not exist. Even the theoretical multiverse would need to be designed to such a degree that it would require a designer. I believe wholeheartedly that physicists will eventually find design attributes and constants in the quantum realm if they haven’t already. Design argues for a Designer.
3. Objective Morality (Moral Argument). Leaving the scientific realm for the philosophical and ethical, objective morality argues for an Objective Lawgiver. God is the best explanation for why objective morality exists. As Brian Manuel, a good friend of mine, said recently, “We can just know certain things to be right and wrong without even being taught.” He is absolutely right! People have an innate sense of morality. That comes from a Moral Lawgiver who we know to be God.
4. Necessary Being (Ontological Argument). In the end, one only has two options. Either an eternal nothingness (meaning again, “no-thing,” not even quantum particles) brought forth something from absolute nothingness, or an eternal Being brought everything that exists into being. The latter makes far more sense and actually adheres more to the scientific method than the former.
5. Explanation for Data (Information Argument). Why is there anything at all? Even though the quantum world is a strange place, it still behaves according to certain laws. Why are there quantum particles? Quantum fields? Why do physical processes and procedures exist? One explanation: God. For any data to exist, a programmer must exist. That Programmer must be God himself.
6. Science and Mathematics. Ironically, the scientific method and mathematics appeal to God’s existence. Scientists hold that the universe operates according to certain laws on a regular basis. The ability to do science itself means that human beings have been given cognitive abilities to observe the universe and, interestingly, have been placed in a position where the universe is observable. One must inadvertently appeal to the divine to even do science and mathematics. To add to this point, the beauty one finds in nature would have no real aesthetic value unless God exists.
7. Historicity of Jesus’s Resurrection. One of the most historically provable events of ancient history is Jesus’s crucifixion and resurrection. Jesus’s resurrection is quite intriguing because he continuously appealed to God the Father to raise him from the dead. For Jesus to have risen from the dead indicates that the one whom he mentioned did what Jesus claimed he would do. The resurrection of Jesus points to a transcendent reality we call God.
8. Miracles and Spiritual Encounters. Craig Keener wrote a two-volume work describing the many documented miracles in modern times. While God may not always perform a miracle in every circumstance, a good deal of evidence suggests that God has performed miracles throughout history. Added with the many spiritual encounters people have had with the divine provides an added case that God does indeed exist.
9. Near-Death Experiences and Consciousness. This is a fascinating area of study. Gary Habermas has noted that there are over 100 medically confirmed cases of near-death experiences where people have died and reported events that happened on this side of eternity which could be corroborated by others. The events described along with experiences of meeting God and the feelings of peace add to the case for God’s existence. Most certainly near-death experiences prove that materialism is a dead philosophy.
10. Purpose and Meaning. For anything to have purpose and meaning, God must exist. If Hawking is right in that the universe is all there is and there is nothing else, nothing, including his research, has any meaning or value. Meaning, value, and purpose are found only because God exists.

I could certainly list other reasons to believe in God’s existence. But these will suffice for now. Hawking was a man of great intellect. Yet, despite his great mental prowess, it is quite odd that he could never quite see the evidence for God. While he could see, he was quite blind. Hawking said that “religion is a fairy tale for those afraid of the dark.” I believe John Lennox provided a stronger claim by noting that “atheism is a fairy tale for those afraid of the light.”

​Brian G. Chilton is the founder of BellatorChristi.com and is the host of The Bellator Christi Podcast. He received his Master of Divinity in Theology from Liberty University (with high distinction); his Bachelor of Science in Religious Studies and Philosophy from Gardner-Webb University (with honors); and received certification in Christian Apologetics from Biola University. Brian is currently enrolled in the Ph.D. program in Theology and Apologetics at Liberty University and is a member of the Evangelical Theological Society and the Evangelical Philosophical Society. Brian has been in the ministry for over 15 years and serves as the Senior Pastor of Westfield Baptist Church in northwestern North Carolina.
Original Blog Source: http://bit.ly/2qcNP6q

Mikel Del Rosario
Do you have to be absolutely certain about something like “God exists” before you can say that you actually know it? Christians who talk about the evidence for God sometimes get frustrated when skeptics challenge a basic premise like “everything that begins to exist has a cause,” by saying that we haven’t explored the entire universe to know if that’s true. Maybe you’ve heard a friend say you can’t actually know anything about God unless you’re absolutely sure about it.

But saying this is an either-or kind of thing is a false dilemma. In this post, I’ll explain why you don’t have to have 100% certainty before you can know that God is real.
No good reason for either-or-thinkingIn Philosophy, saying you have certainty about something means it’s impossible for you to be wrong. So, maybe saying “I exist” is one of the few things that fall into that category. But some skeptics say you can’t really know much about anything at all. Others say your beliefs aren’t justified even if they turn out to be true. For them, we can know almost nothing about God and our world since nobody can be absolutely certain about most things. But the idea that knowing something is the same as being absolutely sure about it turns out to be self-defeating. In fact, even though they say we can’t know much about anything, many seem to think they know enough to correct you if you say you know God is real. 

Think about it. The hyper-skeptical view is that you can’t say you know that God exists unless it’s impossible for you to be wrong about it. But is there any good reason to say that knowledge is the same as certainty? No. For example, I know that I’m writing this post on my computer. But it’s possible that I’m just dreaming about it. Still, does the mere fact that it’s possible that I’m dreaming means that I can’t know that I’m using my computer? Of course not.

Skeptics think they know something you don’t when they say you’re wrongThe thing is, skeptics, do claim to know certain things. For example, “Since we can’t go back in time to watch the big bang, we can’t know that the universe had a beginning” or “since we haven’t yet discovered every possible naturalistic option, we can’t know that God caused the universe.” These are actually claims to know something. But how do they know that?
Some skeptics have told me that in order for you to know something, you have to be 100% sure that you know it. But can’t you know something even if you aren’t entirely sure that you know it? Sure you can. For example, imagine that you memorized all the correct answers to the review questions in your textbook for class. Even if you’re not sure what questions will be on the quiz, you have a pretty good guess that some of them will be. Unbeknownst to you, every single one of those questions you studied actually make up the entirety of next week’s quiz.

In this scenario, you would actually know all the answers to the questions on next week’s quiz. You’d know the answers to a quiz you haven’t taken yet—even if you don’t realize that you actually know the answers! Turns out, you don’t have to be 100% sure (or even aware) that you know something in order for you to actually know it.
If the evidence for God’s existence seems compelling to you, there’s no need to be shy or tentative about your beliefs. You don’t have to have 100% certainty before you can know that God is real. 
​

I am not going to recount the whole debate. I am simply going to discuss some of the most important points and issues. (For those interested, Michael has a podcast of the debate/issue.)

​What is ‘Evil’?
Michael was asked by the moderator, Adam Tucker (his thoughts on the discussion are here), to define what he meant by ‘evil.’ He said that evil is the intentional harm of a sentient being. There is no such thing, he said, of an entity that is evil, such as evil spirits, or anything that is pure evil.
​
I largely agree. Following Augustine, I hold that evil is simply the privation of good. In other words, evil is the corruption of a good thing. The classic example is blindness in the eye. The eye should have a certain power (sight) that it does not. It is lacking and is corrupted. Thus, it is physically evil. Then there is a moral evil. This happens when a person lacks virtues. Overall, though, Michael and I basically agree on what evil is and that there is no existing thing that is pure evil. For Christians, to exist is to somehow be like God, which is good. Further, following Aquinas, good seeks its perfection. Thus, there is a contradiction with an existing evil. Evil really has no goal or purpose in itself. Thus, an existing thing that is somehow good since it has being (in a sense like God) and that seeks its perfection cannot be pure evil.

At this point, we discussed the problem of evil and what it is exactly.

​The Problem of Evil Briefly Stated
There are basically 2 forms of the problem of evil: the deductive form and the inductive form. The deductive form is also called the logical argument from evil and argues that the co-existence of the classical view of God and evil are logically impossible. This is the argument Michael used (from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy):
​
1.      If God exists, then God is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect.
2.      If God is omnipotent, then God has the power to eliminate all evil.
3.      If God is omniscient, then God knows when evil exists.
4.      If God is morally perfect, then God has the desire to eliminate all evil.
5.      Evil exists.
6.      If evil exists and God exists, then either God doesn’t have the power to eliminate all evil, or doesn’t know when evil exists or doesn’t have the desire to eliminate all evil.
7.      Therefore, God doesn’t exist.
 
This argument makes several assumptions. The most problematic in my view is that God is morally perfect. Many, if not most, Christian theologians take it for granted that God is morally perfect. However, I would argue that God is not the kind of being to be moral. That is not to say he is not good; he is just not morally good. I have written that God is not a moral being. I have also written that God’s goodness does not depend on what he does, but what he is. How does this relate to the problem of evil? If it is indeed the case that God is not a moral being with obligations to man, it makes all the difference in the world. I will not rewrite the articles above on God, morality, and goodness. I will summarize those positions here as they relate to the problem of evil.

As I said in the debate, J. L. Mackie, a notorious atheist of the twentieth century, said that if one gives up a premise in the problem of evil as just laid out, then the problem doesn’t arise (see The Problem of Evil edited by Adams and Adams, page 1). This is exactly what I said we need to do. There are certain assertions/assumptions that have to be made in order for this argument (the problem of evil) to work. I argue that the assertion that God is a morally perfect being is false. If we take that out of the problem, the problem falls.

I am not suggesting this simply to get out of this argument. There are really good reasons for not thinking that God is a moral being, at least in the sense we normally mean when referring to humans being moral. When we say a person is moral, we mean that he behaves well and as he should. In other words, there is a prescribed way in which men are supposed to behave. If they do, they are moral. If they don’t, they are immoral.

I am arguing that God has no prescribed way in which he should behave. There are no obligations imposing on God. God transcends the category of morality like he transcends time and space. Morality is a created category wrapped up in what it means to be a human. Without created beings to live up to some objective standard that God has created him to live up to, there is no moral law.

If this is correct, then God is not a moral being and thus cannot be a morally perfect being. But this is the linchpin of the logical problem of evil as Michael has argued. Once this assertion is removed, as Mackie says, there simply is no logical problem of evil. There is no contradiction with an omnipotent, omniscient being existing alongside of evil. Thus, the problem of evil does not even arise.

All of this is to say that God has no obligation to how he orchestrates the universe. To say that God is morally obligated means that he has to treat his creation in a certain way. This is the basic thrust of the problem of evil. To put it another way, as Michael did at one point, the problem of evil boils down to this: “If God really does exist I would expect the universe to be different/better.” The assumption here is that God should operate the way we think he should. He doesn’t. The inference is that he doesn’t exist.

Again, if we take away the assumption/assertion that God is morally perfect then the problem of evil not only fails, it never gets off the ground. (Please remember we are talking about the academic/philosophical issue of evil and not the emotional/pastoral concern.)

This is not to say God is not good; he is just not morally good. He is metaphysically good and perfect. Given our definition of evil, this just means God lacks nothing. His existence is perfect and cannot be corrupted.

The story of Job illustrates my point that God is not obligated to treat his creatures in any certain way. In the opening chapters of Job God basically dares Satan to attack Job. God maintains to Satan that Job will not curse him (God). Satan agrees. The only caveat is that Satan cannot touch Job. Job’s family (except his wife) is killed, and he loses all of his many possessions. Yet he does not curse God. God gives Satan another chance, but this time Satan can inflict Job with disease; although he cannot kill him. Job is inflicted with sores and physical issues. Still, he does not curse God.

Job’s friends show up and stay with Job, silent, for a week. For many chapters after this Job’s friends argue about what Job did to bring this judgment upon him. They maintain that God would not do this without some (just) cause. Job maintained his innocence and wanted to take God to court and try him for being unjust.

At the end of the book, God shows up. Does he try to explain to Job why he did what he did? Does he offer a theodicy or defense for his actions? No. He basically asks Job where he was when God made all of the wonders of the world. Job cannot answer and repents. In short, God does not try to get off the hook, as it were. Rather he says, “I’m God, and you are not.”

I think this illustrates my point that God does not have to act in any certain way with his people. He is not unjust in dealing with Job the way he did. However, let’s put a human in the place of God and Satan in this story. If a human did to Job what God and Satan did, we would almost certainly say the human would be unjust. However, we would not, presumably, say that God is unjust. Why? Because he’s God. There is no standard by which to judge him. God transcends morality and yet is still perfectly good.

​Philosophy vs. Science
This above point is one that I could not get Michael to acknowledge. He did not want to stray from his scientific position. (By ‘scientific’ I mean the modern sense of the word to refer to the natural sciences like biology and chemistry. This should be contrasted with the historical sense of a discipline’s conclusions being demonstrated via first principles and logic. In this latter sense, philosophy and theology were considered sciences.) This is unfortunate because the issues of God and evil are inherently philosophical. As I have written, natural science alone cannot demonstrate God’s existence. Thus, to adequately deal with the issues of the discussion we have to delve into philosophy. Michael would have none of it.
​
Michael’s main point here is that if God is not measurable, then we can’t know he exists. As I pointed out this is a category mistake as God is not a material being. Thus, even if he did exist, we could not measure him–which Michael acknowledged.
Throughout the debate, Michael approached the issue from the point of view of natural science. I approached it from philosophy. In short, the questions of God’s existence and evil cannot be decided by natural science since they are not physical things in the natural world to be studied: God is not a being in nature and evil is a description of the nature of being (a philosophical concept).
 
Michael offered a lot of red herrings. I will not deal with those here as they are, well, red herrings.

​Conclusion
The problem of evil is not a problem concerning God’s existence if God is not a moral being. Further, questions of God’s existence and evil are inherently philosophical. If you are interested in this topic, I recommend Brian Davies’ The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil.